Clinical features and patency rates of Remedy® biodegradable peripheral stents

Summary Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the mid-term results of Remedy® biodegradable stents, which have recently come into use for lower-extremity arterial occlusive disease. Methods: Sixty-five patients, who underwent surgical intervention in various cardiovascular surgery clinics throughout Turkey, were included in the study. The total number of stents used was 92. The mean age of the patients was 64.11 ± 24.13 years (20–82), and 16 (24.6%) were female. The mean number of stents per patient was 1.42, and 70.7% of the lesions were TASC type A. Patients were followed for a mean of 32 months. Sixty-five patients underwent a control examination using either digital subtraction angiography or colour Doppler ultrasonography. In-stent restenosis was defined as ≥ 50% stenosis in the stent area in asymptomatic patients. The procedure was repeated if the degree of stenosis was ≥ 70%. Results During the follow-up period, restenosis (≥ 50% stenosis) was observed in seven patients (10.7%). The patency rate after secondary intervention was 100%, and there was no loss of limbs in any patient. Restenosis was observed in six patients with superficial femoral artery stents, and in one patient with a popliteal arterial stent. Conclusion Our experience shows that Remedy® biodegradable peripheral stents were safe and effective in our cohort of patients, with acceptable patency rates.

The clinical use of stents for the treatment of peripheral artery disease is favoured for both long-term primary and secondary patencies, as well as shorter hospitalisation periods. 1 The major stent types include bare-metal, nitinol, drug-eluting (for example, Sirolimus), ePTFE + nitinol (Viabahn) and biodegradable stents. 2 Biodegradable stents contain the biologically degradable PLLA (poly-L-lactic acid) polymer. A few years after their implantation, biodegradable stents dissolve into water and carbon dioxide, and are absorbed by the arterial tissue. [3][4][5] The development of restenosis in the stented segment does not limit the use of other procedures, and it is suitable for re-ballooning. 6 In addition, when compared to metal stents, PLLA stents are more suitable as a platform for drug-releasing stents. 7,8 This study investigated the mid-term results of Remedy ® biodegradable stents.

methods
Sixty-five symptomatic patients were included in this study during a mean 32-month period between January 2010 and December 2014. The mean age of patients was 64.11 years (20-82). Biodegradable peripheral stents (Remedy ® , Kyoto Medical, Japan) were used.
The stent-application procedure was performed in symptomatic patients who had ≥ 70% stenosis of the native artery diameter. An informed consent form was obtained from all patients prior to the procedure. Additionally, ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee of the University (2014-160).
An exclusive stent-application team was used to place the peripheral stents into appropriate patients (according to diameter of vessel and length of lesion) in different cities. Only selected lesions were studied due to the limited diameter (5-8 mm) and length (36 mm) of the stents.
Patients excluded from the study were those with long segments of stenosis, upper-extremity arterial interventions, large-diameter lesions, and if more than one stent was required. TASC type C and D patients who had had previous surgery and had appropriate vessel diameters and lesion lengths were included in the study. All patients were included in the study prospectively. In addition, some of the cases were re-evaluated retrospectively (especially patients with stent re-stenosis).
The peripheral arterial lesions of patients were classified in accordance with the TASC classification scheme. 9 All procedures were performed under spinal or local anaesthesia. The anaesthesia protocol was selected according to patient compliance.
During the procedure, anticoagulation was provided by the administration of 100-300 U/kg of heparin. Following the procedure, 150 mg of clopidogrel (Plavix ® , Sanofi, Turkey) was used as the anti-aggregant treatment protocol for patients who did not have any contraindications, and the treatment was subsequently continued with a dose of 75 mg/day.
The patients were monitored post-operatively in the first week, and second and sixth months. After one year, there were no significant clinical symptoms in any of the 43 patients. The mean follow-up period was 32 months. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used to examine nine randomly selected patients, whereas colour Doppler ultrasonography (USG) was used to examine 52 randomly selected patients. Four symptomatic patients were evaluated separately.

Statistical analysis
For analysis of the demographic, pre-operative, operative and postoperative data, and comparison of the median ± t standard deviation results of the group, categorical data chi-squared tests were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA) 17.0 statistics software; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

results
Twenty-seven patients had diabetes, 38 had hyperlipidaemia, and seven had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Fifteen patients underwent coronary bypass surgery or were diagnosed with coronary artery disease (Table 1).
Sixty-five patients were examined with DSA or colour Doppler USG. DSA was performed in all symptomatic patients, and Doppler USG was performed in all patients.
In-stent restenosis was defined as ≥ 50% stenosis in the stent area in asymptomatic patients. The procedure was repeated if the degree of stenosis was ≥ 70%. None of the nine asymptomatic patients who were examined with DSA had ≥ 50% lesions. Three patients who were examined with colour Doppler USG had 50-70% lesions (two patients had a superficial femoral artery lesion; one had a popliteal arterial stent). None of the patients had ≥ 70% lesions.
In total, 46 patients had type A lesions, 12 had type B lesions, five had type C lesions, and two had type D lesions, according to the TASC classification scheme. 9 Sixteen out of 65 patients (24.6%) were female and 49 (75.4%) were male ( Table 1).
The total number of stents used was 92, and the mean number of stents per patient was 1.42. [1][2][3] The mean stent length was 53 mm per patient (36-108 mm). Twenty-two stents (24%) were implanted into the right superficial femoral artery, 31 (33.7%) into the left superficial femoral artery, 14 (15.2%) into the left iliac artery, 17 (18.4%) into the right iliac artery, five (7.8%) into the left popliteal artery, and three (3.2%) into the right popliteal artery. The size of the stents ranged between 5 and 8 mm; the most commonly used stent width was 6 mm.
The procedure was performed under spinal anaesthesia in five patients (7.7%) and local anaesthesia in 60 patients (92.3%) ( Table 2). There was 100% success rate of the procedure. In all patients, it was possible to palpate the pulse with a hand on the distal part of the stent zone after the procedure. There was no limb loss in any patient.
The mean follow-up period was 32 months (18-48 months), and in-stent restenosis developed in three patients. These patients received a secondary balloon dilatation procedure. The superficial femoral artery stent was fully occluded in one patient, and the patient underwent femoropoliteal bypass. The remaining patients have had no complications from the stenting.
During the follow-up period, DSA was performed in all patients who were admitted symptomatically (four patients). Total occlusion was observed in one patient and 70-90% stenosis was observed in three patients (all patients had a superficial femoral artery stent) ( Table 3). All patients were alive, so the Kaplan-Meier life curve was not included in the text, and we used single-group analysis.

discussion
This was a unique study demonstrating the results of mid-term peripheral application of biodegradable stents. The findings of this study show that biodegradable stents had successful clinical outcomes during an average of 32 months' follow-up period. It appears from this study that biodegradable stents have good mid-term patency rates in peripheral arterial occlusions.
In patients with limb ischaemia, the first-line approach for revascularisation has shifted over the past decade from bypass surgery to endovascular intervention. 10 Stenting for the treatment of lower-extremity arterial occlusive disease is an important tool and continues to evolve, with new stent designs and technologies being developed to provide superior patency rates and limb salvage. 11,12

AFRICA
Short-and long-term outcomes of peripheral artery stents are available for metal, nitinol and e-PTFE-coated nitinol stents. Initially, efforts were directed at overcoming the negative outcomes of metal stents, especially in long lesions. 13 Owing to the recent advances in stent technology, biodegradable stents have been produced to avoid the undesirable outcomes of classic stents, which lead to mechanical restenosis with stent fracture. This technology has been extensively evaluated in the coronary artery system, but not in peripheral arteries. The outcome of bio-absorbable stents remains unclear. 14 We therefore investigated the patency rates of this technology in the peripheral arterial system.
Outcomes of even classical stents have not been sufficiently documented. Short hospitalisation times, successful outcomes in stent patency, higher secondary patency rates, and comparable outcomes with grafts have increased the popularity of peripheral stent applications in TASC type A and B lesions. The primary and secondary patency rates of PTFE-coated stents in veins above the knee have equal efficacy to PTFE grafts, and are comparable with that of saphenous veins. Formation of the neo-intima layer in closed stents prevents the development of restenosis in the early period, and ensures that stents remain patent for a longer period. 15,16 The use of stents for suitable lesions, especially in the case of iliac artery lesions, protects the patient from possible abdominal surgery and increases the incidence of long-term patency as the vein diameter is also suitable. In the present study, stenosis was not observed during the follow-up period after iliac artery stent implantation.
The PLLA peripheral stent is the first fully bioresorbable stent to be implanted in humans, with complete degradation taking 12 to 24 months. This resulted in less vessel wall injury during implantation and therefore less initial thrombus formation and reduced intimal hyperplasia.
The existing literature on the use of biodegradable peripheral stents on coronary arteries is limited, and their superiority over drug-releasing stents has not been proven to date. The existing data regarding the use of biodegradable peripheral stents in peripheral arteries is insufficient. 17 The application of biodegradable peripheral stents has positive contributions to the collateral system in particular. The collateral system in the application area does not close, but rather increases in the long term, and supports development of the existing systems. 18 Collateral closure was not observed during the procedure in our patient group, and we also observed that these veins stayed open in the patient group examined with DSA.
The major advantages of using biodegradable stents include practical application, a suitable structure for secondary interventions, their absorbable and non-depositing nature, perfect tissue compatibility, and a lower rate of restenosis in experimental studies. A feature of the biodegradable stent is that it allows for re-intervention due to its structure (after implantation of the stent, integration occurs between the stent structure and vessel wall). Therefore re-intervention can easily be carried out (balloon and stent or surgery) in TASC type A lesions when they become TASC type C or D. Another advantage is that there is no possibility of stent fracture, which eliminates anti-aggregant use. They are also suitable for use in patients with a metal allergy.
There are certain disadvantages, including insufficient number of clinical studies investigating long-term outcomes. Moreover, the length and diameter of the available stents are not suited for every clinical scenario.
The absence of a control group was the main limitation of this study. The ethics committee approved the study protocol, which was created with the use of a single type of stent to avoid bias and to provide similar opportunities for all patients. This pilot study was therefore conducted without a control group.

Conclusion
In this study, primary implantation of a Remedy ® biodegradable stent for moderate-length lesions in lower-extremity arterial occlusive segments of patients with claudication was associated with better mid-term results. Our experience shows that the Remedy ® peripheral stents were safe and effective in our cohort of patients, with acceptable patency rates. should the findings of the dapt trial change my practice?
One of AfricaPCR 2016's final sessions discussed this question and a distinguished panel concluded, albeit with a few reservations and caveats, that the answer is 'yes'. DAPT was the first large trial to evaluate the benefits of dual antiplatelet therapy prolonged beyond 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DAPT set out to investigate, as an effectiveness endpoint, whether prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a reduction in stent thrombosis and in major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The safety endpoint was its effect on moderate or severe bleeding.
It found that prolonging therapy up to 30 months was associated with a 71% relative risk reduction in stent thrombosis and a 29% relative risk reduction in major events. But there was a price to pay in that there was a 1.6-2.5% increase in rate of bleeding.
Prior to DAPT, previous practice had been to give therapy for much shorter periods, usually one to six months. Reviewing what was known before the study, Dr Colin Schamroth, from Johannesburg, noted that most previous studies had suggested that there was no solid evidence to support treatment beyond 12 months. TRITON-TIMI had hinted that there might be a case for prolonging therapy, but had still concluded that most benefit was accrued over 12 months.
The 2012 European guidelines currently recommend dual antiplatelet therapy for a minimum of one month in patients with bare-metal stents and six months in those with drugeluting stents, with three to six months for the former and six to 12 months for the latter being the preferred strategy. Drugeluting stents are associated with higher rates of thrombosis. Twelve months of therapy are recommended for unstented STEMI patients.
Drilling down into the details of DAPT, Dr Riaz Dawood, also from Johannesburg, noted that it was a well-designed trial with results that were valid and not underpowered. It included nearly 10 000 patients from 11 countries. However, none of these was in Africa, South America or Asia. He also underscored that it was a low-risk population, excluding patients with a high risk of bleeding or ischaemic events.
The 29% relative risk reduction in major events was driven mainly by a decrease in myocardial infarction (MI), with no significant differences observed in respect of mortality and haemorrhagic stroke. The increase in bleeding risk was driven by moderate bleeding, with severe, life-threatening bleeding not significant. All-cause mortality, however, showed a 36% increase, but this was not driven by either cardiovascular death or by bleeding, but rather by cancer. Dr Dawood felt that this was most likely a 'play of chance', unrelated to dual antiplatelet therapy.
In conclusion, DAPT found that prolonging therapy up to 30 months was associated with a significant reduction in rates of thrombosis and major events, notably MI, but at a risk of increased rates of bleeding. The MI benefit was not limited to stented sites. The findings were also consistent, regardless of which thienopyridine agents were used.
So should these findings change clinical practice? Prof Pravin Manga, from Johannesburg, offered a cautious 'yes'. 'The evidence suggests that longer and maybe even indefinite therapy may be of benefit, but we need to be very careful when it comes to patient selection.' Dr Dawood echoed this. 'Bleeding worries us more than ischaemic events, and bleeding risk increases with age, so one needs to be especially cautious in elderly patients. But in patients without contra-indications who are at risk of thrombosis, but with a low bleeding risk, why not continue?' Source: AfricaPCR 2016