Send Orders of Reprints at Reprints@benthamscience.org the Eukaryotic Flagellum Makes the Day: Novel and Unforeseen Roles Uncovered after Post-genomics and Proteomics Data

This review will summarize and discuss the current biological understanding of the motile eukaryotic flagel-lum, as posed out by recent advances enabled by post-genomics and proteomics approaches. The organelle, which is crucial for motility, survival, differentiation, reproduction, division and feeding, among other activities, of many eukaryotes, is a great example of a natural nanomachine assembled mostly by proteins (around 350-650 of them) that have been conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution. Flagellar proteins are discussed in terms of their arrangement on to the axoneme, the canonical " 9+2 " microtubule pattern, and also motor and sensorial elements that have been detected by recent proteo-mic analyses in organisms such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, sea urchin, and trypanosomatids. Such findings can be remarkably matched up to important discoveries in vertebrate and mammalian types as diverse as sperm cells, ciliated kidney epithelia, respiratory and oviductal cilia, and neuro-epithelia, among others. Here we will focus on some exciting work regarding eukaryotic flagellar proteins, particularly using the flagellar proteome of C. reinhardtii as a reference map for exploring motility in function, dysfunction and pathogenic flagellates. The reference map for the eukaryotic flagellar proteome consists of 652 proteins that include known structural and intraflagellar transport (IFT) proteins, less well-characterized signal transduction proteins and flagellar associated proteins (FAPs), besides almost two hundred unanno-tated conserved proteins, which lately have been the subject of intense investigation and of our present examination. From the early days of first reports on flagellum [1-8], there has been quite a long way of improvements towards current knowledge [9-18] and our general understanding of how this amazing organelle manages its diversity of biological functions and roles. It would be impossible to introduce the subject of eukaryotic 1 flagellar proteins without mentioning the work of important pioneers such as Joel Rosembaum, Ian Gibbons and Gianni Piperno, among others, who have continuously contributed to the field of flagellum/cilium research in a long, careful, elegant and meticulous series of studies that exploited Chlamydomonas reinhardtii flagella as a model system for studying the biogenesis of subcellular organelles, culminating with the astounding discovery of the intraflagelar transport mechanism (IFT) for explaining the 1 Eukaryotic flagella are here discerned from their prokaryotic counterparts because they are completely different in structure and in evolutionary origin. The bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic flagella have in common the fact that they all project from the cell and wiggle to produce propulsion. intense transit of motor proteins along …


THE EUKARYOTIC FLAGELLUM
From the early days of first reports on flagellum [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], there has been quite a long way of improvements towards current knowledge [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and our general understanding of how this amazing organelle manages its diversity of biological functions and roles. It would be impossible to introduce the subject of eukaryotic 1 flagellar proteins without mentioning the work of important pioneers such as Joel Rosembaum, Ian Gibbons and Gianni Piperno, among others, who have continuously contributed to the field of flagellum/cilium research in a long, careful, elegant and meticulous series of studies that exploited Chlamydomonas reinhardtii flagella as a model system for studying the biogenesis of subcellular organelles, culminating with the astounding discovery of the intraflagelar transport mechanism (IFT) for explaining the gellum and a few related sub-proteomes) that have not been discovered before. Information is usually gained at a large scale and is very valuable to further understand biological processes of the given compartment [31].
Our review interest is mainly about flagellar proteins expressed in one or more compartments of the eukaryotic cilium/flagellum (the terms can be used as equivalent), since these proteins contribute to our understanding of how rather small proteomes (not exceeding from 400-600 proteins) [13,25,29,30] lead to flagella being so different from one to another (number, size, remodeling, paraflagellar structures, and other features) in a wide range of organisms. As long or short projections, thread-like or antenna-like organelles that are surrounded by a specialized extension of the cell membrane, flagella Fig. (1a) and (1b)) comprise complex and dynamic functions associated to genes encoding isoforms of ubiquitous and unique proteins within eukaryotes [reviewed by 15,32]. Research conducted by several groups in model organisms, such as C. reinhardtii, sea urchin, trypanosomatids and mammalian sperm, among many others [16,30,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], has impressively increased our knowledge about this intriguing organelle that is a key part of the motile, dividing and invasive machinery of many eukaryotes.
Eukaryotic cilia and flagella are microtubule-based cellular extensions, which play critical roles in cell motility, development and sensory perception. They interact with the environment through signal transduction and gene expression networks [15,43,[44][45][46], while their important and recently uncovered roles played in several human diseases and physiological conditions create an urgent need to identify genes involved in ciliary assembly and function [28,39,45,[47][48][49]. As complex organelles, comprising a few hundreds of distinct polypeptides and proteins assembled onto a framework of microtubules [33,34], eukaryotic flagella and cilia have one defining feature: the 9+2 axoneme characterized by nine outer doublet microtubules and two central pair singlet microtubules Fig. (2). The nine outer doublets slide relative to one another; dynein arms generate the force for this sliding; radial spokes connect outer doublets with central singlets [33,34]. The transient association of dynein arms attached to one doublet with an adjacent doublet results in microtubule sliding, while the constraints on doublet move-ment convert sliding into bending force. The resultant flagellar beating can be crucial for motility, survival, reproduction or feeding of many eukaryotes. It is believed that the last common ancestor of extant eukaryotes had flagella (possibly a pair) [50], and many of the proteins assembled on to the axoneme have been conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution [37,47,51].
In general, cilia are classified as motile (9+2) or nonmotile (9+0), the latter, also known as primary cilia, are present on most cells in the mammalian body [52]. Although first described as early as 1898 and long considered a vestigial organelle of little functional importance, the primary cilium has become one of the hottest research topics in modern cell biology and physiology due to defects in its assembly or function that have been tightly coupled to many developmental defects, diseases and disorders. In normal tissues, the primary cilium coordinates a series of signal transduction pathways, including Hedgehog (hh) and Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), Wnt, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) alpha, and integrin signaling. In the kidney, the primary cilium may function as a mechano-, chemo-and osmosensing unit that probes the extracellular environment and transmits signals to the cell via, e.g., polycystins, which depend on ciliary localization for appropriate function. Indeed, hypomorphic mutations in the mouse ift88 (previously called Tg737) gene, which encodes a ciliogenic IFT protein [53], result in malformation of primary cilia, and in the collecting ducts of kidney tubules this is accompanied by development of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (PKD). While PKD was one of the first diseases to be linked to dysfunctional primary cilia, defects in this organelle have subsequently been associated with many other phenotypes, including cancer, obesity, diabetes as well as a number of developmental defects. Collectively, these disorders of the cilium are now referred to as the ciliopathies [52,54].
Altogether, cilia and flagella (motile, sensory or primary), comprise one of the most highly conserved structures in eukaryotes and an exciting field of research that has provided amazing results with great impact in several areas of biomedical sciences, including unforeseen roles and sites of action for cilia and flagellar proteins [28,39,41,[55][56][57][58]. Therefore, flagellar genes and proteins, identified and ana- lyzed by multiple post-genomics and proteomics approaches, are the most promising candidates for current and future studies to test whether the encoded and/or expressed proteins are sufficient and necessary for flagella/cilia function, dysfunction and overall activity in studied organisms, particularly using the flagellar proteome of C. reinhardtii [13] as a reference map ( Table 1).
In this review we will focus on some of the most exciting findings, obtained through proteomics analyses, regarding flagellar proteins on eukaryotic motility ( Table 2) and derived activities, on the sense that they have attracted tremendous attention, in recent years, due to unanticipated crucial roles in coordinating a number of physiologically and developmentally important pathways related to flagellar motility in function and dysfunction and also in pathogenic flagellates.

CONSERVED TO DIVERGE IN FLAGELLAR AS-SEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY
Eukaryotic flagella are thought to have played a key role in the development of multicellularity by performing tasks, mostly dependent on the microtubule-based construction, through the coordinated action of groups of flagella (from a single one to several pairs), which display various types of spatio-temporal organization [59,60]. Differences in number, size, differentiated states and remodeling fashions are remarkable in eukaryotic flagella. Just to mention an outstanding comparative example coming from three protozoan parasites, e.g. Plasmodium, Giardia lamblia and Trichomonas: Plasmodium possesses two long flagella that are free from association with the gamete body and a third shorter flagellum (or rudimentary) that is attached to surface of gamete at its anterior end [reviewed by 61, 62]; Giardia , each named A-tubule and B-tubule. Note the presence of radial spokes (RS) and RS proteins (RSPs) as T-shaped structures (in gray) extending from the A-tubule of each doublet to the center of the axoneme (CP), as depicted in Panel B, illustrating the interconnected elements of RSPs, outer dynein arms (ODAs) in green and inner dynein arms (IDAs) in yellow, CP projections in orange. Panel C is the hypothetical "stalk" & "head" model of RSP as a mechanochemical transducer extending from the 9+2 and anchored near the base of the IDA, where the signal input includes calcium binding and/or mechanical strain induced by transient interaction of the spoke head with the central apparatus. Adapted from (and modified after) [113]. Since CaM anchored to the axoneme is a key calcium sensor, while central apparatus and RS are integral elements of calcium signaling pathway [218], four different CaM-interacting protein complexes have been localized: i) to the stalk, RSP2; ii) to the base of the spoke, FAP91; iii and iv) to CP projections, FAP101 and FAP221 [113], with three of these homologs being present in Leishmania genomes (CAC14327, CAB71185 and LmjF35.0290). Several models, including those proposed by [113], [148] and [218], are considered in Panel D, which stands for the probable locations of the RSPs, and in Panel E, which stands for their molecular modules relative to a CP microtubule (right) and an IDA on an outer doublet (left).       Proteins IDs are those used in the Chlamydomonas flagellar proteome [13] and they may be included in more than one category (e.g., a calcium-binding protein that is also an enzyme such as C_700061, Similar to Calcium Transporting ATPase). References used in the table are either listed in the manuscript or listed in the Supplementary Reference list provided.
lamblia possesses four pairs of flagella and Trichomonas four free flagella and a fifth recurrent one [63]. In many eukaryotic species, this organization of flagella will be present in assorted and distinctive forms, one of which have been mostly studied and became a model: the biflagellate green alga C. reinhardtii.
Chlamydomonas is ideal for an integrated view of flagellum function because its genetics is similar to yeast (relative adaptability and quick generation time), but, unlike yeast, Chlamydomonas has two flagella that are virtually identical to human cilia [32]. Since sufficient biological material is easily available to efficiently establish biochemical purifica-tion procedures of sub-cellular fractions, this green alga is also an excellent model for proteomics research as well.
Most of the previously identified human ciliary disease genes have orthologs in Chlamydomonas that have been shown to be involved in flagellar assembly [64]. C. reinhardtii provides an excellent model system for investigating flagellar gene expression network responses, since its two flagella act as environmental sensors for the cell. Changing the cell's environment in various ways causes changes in flagellar morphology. For example, experimental acidification of the medium (acid shock) induces flagellar excision [65] followed by regrowth or assembly of new flagella within 2 hr [66,67]. It has been shown that stimulation of Chlamydomonas by treatment with IBMX (3-isobutyl-1methylxanthine), for example, induces flagellar resorption or shortening of the flagella (referred to as disassembly) [67,68]. Resorption, in turn, is known to be reversible with the additional complication that the resorbed flagellar components can be re-utilized to assemble flagella in the absence of protein synthesis. Synthesis of flagellar proteins is stimulated after cells are chemically induced to resorb their flagella [66][67][68]. This reinforces the complexity of deflagellation and reflagellation (also called flagellar disassembly and assembly) as multifaceted events [68][69][70] with conflicting evidences on the synthesis of different flagellar proteins required to regenerate full-length flagella after deflagellation. Chlamydomonas cells can be induced to shed their flagella via katanin-mediated severing, after which the flagella immediately begin to regenerate. During this process, it has been shown that many known flagellar proteins are transcriptionally induced, with most transcripts reaching maximum accumulation between 30-45 minutes [69] after deflagellation [70,32]. In contrast, genes encoding components of other organelles do not show this induction in response to deflagellation [32,71].
Coupled with the availability of the Chlamydomonas genome (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Chlre4) [72] and 232,208 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) processed from various public sources by Chlamy EST-Terminus [73], these observations propose a systematic strategy for flagellar/ciliary gene identification, which provides further assistance to improved proteomic approaches [32].
The flagellar proteome of C. reinhardtii has been used as a reference map for proteomics research on cilia and flagella since its publication [13], with over 400 citations, and we here emphasize its extreme importance for the field. The reference map consists of an estimated total of 652 proteins (identified by Pazour and colleagues through mass spectrometry (MS) and depicted here in a simplified view on Table 1); 360 proteins identified by five or more peptides (most likely to be true flagellar proteins) and 292 identified by two to four peptides (likely to be candidate flagellar proteins that need to be confirmed by further analysis). We must reinforce that 122 are known flagellar proteins (distributed in thirteen groups of structural and transport proteins), as well as approximately 200 less well-characterized signal transduction proteins and flagellar associated proteins (FAPs), besides more than a hundred conserved proteins unannotated [13,30].
Many investigations have demonstrated coordination between flagellar gene expression and flagellar assembly and disassemby. During the course of flagellar assembly, for example, genes encoding alpha-and -tubulin are transiently upregulated and return to prestimulation levels as the regenerating flagella reach full length [68,[74][75][76][77]. Recent genomic [32] and proteomic [13] studies have profiled similar expression patterns for large numbers of additional genes during flagellar assembly, using the reference map for the flagellar proteome of C. reinhardtii [13].

The Intraflagellar Transport (IFT) Genes and Proteins
Studies across eukaryotic systems indicate that flagella are constructed (assembled) and maintained through the highly conserved process of IFT [9,19,20]. Well characterized in Chlamydomonas, IFT is a rapid movement of particles along the axonemal microtubules of cilia and flagella, being a specialized bidirectional transport process mediated by the ancestral and conserved IFT complex. The import and export of proteins appear to be largely mediated by IFT particles that move along the axonemal doublet microtubules just beneath the flagellar membrane [12,19,78] and are associated either with kinesin or with dynein motor proteins, recycling kinesin and discarding axoneme proteins back to the cytosol [79]. It has been reported that IFT is not only required for building cilia/flagella, but also directly involved in sensory signal transduction in Chlamydomonas [80] and secretory functions [81].
The IFT system consists of anterograde (from the cell body to the ciliary tip) and retrograde (from the ciliary tip to the cell body) motor complexes associated with raft-like large protein complexes called IFT particles. Genetic and biochemical analyses in C. reinhardtii and Caenorhabditis elegans have identified IFT motor subunits as well as many of the IFT particle components [reviewed in 12,16,82,83]. The main function of IFT is likely to be the delivery of axonemal substructures from the basal body region to the distal end of the flagellum, where the axoneme assembles [84][85][86]. The particles that are transported by IFT are composed of several protein subunits [87,88]. Exact functions of the individual subunits are not known, but the proteins are well conserved between green algae, nematodes, and vertebrates [20,88]. In Chlamydomonas, IFT particles comprise two large complexes: complex A is composed of seven subunits (IFT42, IFT121, IFT122A/B, IFT139, IFT140, and IFT144/148); complex B is composed of fifteen subunits (IFT20, IFT22, IFT25, IFT27, IFT46, IFT52, IFT54, IFT57,  IFT70, IFT74/72, IFT80, IFT81, IFT88, and IFT172) [42,88]. Therefore, IFT complex is now estimated to be composed of at least 22 different polypeptides, including the recently reported IFT25 [42,[89][90][91], which is homologous to the human heat shock protein family B (small) member 11, as well as IFT70 [91] and the recently described subcomplex IFT144/140/122 [92].
Even though significant strides have been made in dissecting the mechanisms of IFT, it remains a poorly understood process, including its structure and architecture [92]. For instance, the full complement of its components is not yet known and the organization, regulation, and specific functions and molecular structure of the IFT machinery are incompletely understood [92,93,42]. Exciting recent advances have linked IFT not only with the delivery of ciliary components required for the assembly, maintenance, and length control of motile and sensory cilia but also for carrying cilium-based signals that control cell function, gene expression, cell division, animal development, and the onset of some human diseases [94][95][96]. Given the important biological functions of IFT, the development of a precise understanding of how IFT particles and their associated proteins are moved, as cargo along the flagellum/cilium [16], will continue to be a priority.
There has been an increase in the identification of IFT homologs in the last years, although only the homologs of the classical components (IFT88, -57, 52-and -20) had been in vitro identified in all studied eukaryotic flagellate/ciliate models and also in human cells [as reviewed by 12]. There are reports of homologs to members of the IFT complex proteins in several organisms, including trypanosomatids such as Trypanosoma [40,[97][98][99][100] and Leishmania, the latter that has been our own focus upon the eukaryotic flagellum [101][102][103]. The first work to provide the actual demonstration of IFT in Trypanosoma brucei [100] also revealed the activity of this process in both old (in maintenance) and new flagellum (in construction) in the same cell. When the new flagellum is assembled, incorporation of new subunits takes place at its distal tip, whereas only a small amount of material is turned over in the old flagellum [104]. That report demonstrated the restricted location of IFT particles to two sets of specific outer doublets (3-4 and 7-8) in T. brucei. It has been argued [40] that such restricted location could be partially explained by physical constraints resulting from the presence of the extra-axonemal PFR [105]. IFT proteins are abundant at the base of the flagellum, where they localize to the apical region of the basal body [40,106].
Although the coordination of structure and gene expression is well characterized for flagellar assembly, the knowledge about gene regulation during disassembly had been largely limited to a known decrease in expression of alphaand -tubulin mRNA levels [68,71,74]. Recently, important roles played by IFT in flagellar assembly and disassembly have called attention [44], such as the transport of flagellar components along the length of the axoneme [83] and putative actions to regulate flagellar length [107,108] and assembly highlighted in IFT52 roles (BLD1/osm-6) [109].
The first IFT proteins to have a crystal structure deposited at PDB were the Chlamydomonas IFT25 and IFT27 [PDB 2YC2 and 2YC4] [110], which comprise a complex (IFT25/IFT27) that interact via a conserved interface seen on Fig. (3). Recent results on IFT subunits structure and function [92,110] will certainly provide big steps towards a better understanding of the IFT complex.

Flagellar Associated Proteins (FAPs)
The flagellar proteome [13] contains at least 60 less wellcharacterized flagellar associated proteins (FAPs), whose importance will eventually increase as functions are described for these particular FAPs not yet clarified. The genes encoding some FAPs show regulation during flagellar assembly [13,32,77] and disassembly [44]. Twenty-one flag-ellar genes, also present in the Chlamydomonas proteome reference map [13], have been shown to directly regulate assembly and disassembly [44]. The expression profile of FAP12, for example, is similar to that of known flagellar structural components. Alternatively, genes encoding the less well characterized FAP277 and FAP280 exhibited unique regulation profiles, which are not characteristic of known flagellar structural genes. It has been argued [44] that microarray technology has the ability to predict genes involved in regulatory networks on the basis of similar expression profiles [111]. This is another example of post-genomics contribution to improve the understanding on what could explain, then, how the product of the FAP12 gene may, therefore, serve a structural role, whereas the products of FAP277 and -280 may play regulatory roles, perhaps in regulating flagellar length. FAP133 has been suggested to be a component of the IFT system [112] based on two previous evidences: i) it is encoded in Chlamydomonas by a single gene (upregulated upon deflagellation) [32]; and ii) it is readily extracted from the flagella when the membrane is disrupted. Such hypothesis was further supported by the examination that FAP133 is specifically depleted, together with other IFT components, from mutant flagella [112].
Recently, C. reinhardtii FAP221 was found to be homologous to the mammalian protein Pcdp1, a member of a protein complex that interacts with Ca2+-CaM and localizes to the C1d projection of the central apparatus [113]. Such results provided the first assignment of polypeptides to the C1d central projection, and have, thus, established a definitive and essential role for FAP221 in regulating motility.
Studies like these [32,44,112,113] add information to start defining the interrelationship between the cellular and molecular networks regulating flagellar changes. We believe that only through global, parallel expression and highthroughput analyses of the genes and proteins associated with flagellar assembly and disassembly (such as provided by microarray analyses or RNA and protein expression profiles, e.g.,) it will be possible to dissect the intricacies of this complex organelle and to uncover fundamental regulatory mechanisms that are part of a whole-cell response to flagellar stimulation.

Flagellar Chaperones
Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperones known to localize within cilia and flagella and also to be highly induced during flagellar regeneration (HSP70A and HSP90A), playing important roles in flagellar and ciliary assembly [10,114]. The high complexity and the highly specialized, continuous turnover of flagella can be illustrated by the fact that genes encoding flagellar proteins typically are transcriptionally upregulated during organellar assembly [34,78,115]. Therefore, it is quite obvious to realize why chaperones are so widely distributed ciliary and flagellar component [32], potentially related to overall axonemal protein dynamics [114]. Note that HSP70A is an abundant cytoplasmic protein also present in flagella [114] and just one of seven Chlamydomonas Hsp70 family members [116]. Within flagella, wild-type HSP70A is distributed in a discontinuous, punctate fashion and concentrates in flagellar tips [114], very similar to that of the components of the IFT system [12].
RNA expression data can provide information about potential cilia/flagella-related genes that is complementary to direct proteomic approaches [32], which can reveal only intrinsic components of the flagellum. The so-called RNA transcriptional profiling approach is also complementary to comparative genomics approaches because it can reveal genes (e.g., tubulin) that are found in organisms lacking flagella but that nevertheless play important roles in flagellar assembly [32,71,107], Gene function discovery by RNA transcriptional profiling tends to be most effective at identifying genes responsible for the development of new structures, such as in development [117], rather than identifying catalytic functions such as enzyme activities, which are typically not modulated in abundance by varying RNA transcription [32,118]. In the case of flagella, even though turnover entails continuous assembly at the tip, the steady-state turnover is sufficiently smaller than the initial assembly rate. A strategy of identifying flagellar genes was validated with basis on induction with results addressing RNA transcription levels of 61 known flagellar components (33 found to be strongly induced during regeneration) [32]. These included genes encoding IDAs and ODAs, RSPs, IFT components, regulatory proteins, cofactors of tubulin folding, such as CPN2 and eight subunits of the T-complex protein 1 tubulinfolding factor (also known as CCT and to be involved with ciliary assembly [119]. The elevated requirement for tubulinfolding chaperones in assembling a microtubule-based structure such as the flagellum likely explains the induction of these genes, supporting the idea that analysis of RNA transcription induction during flagellar assembly can identify genes involved in assembly that are not themselves flagellar components [32].

Novel Roles for Unexpected Flagellar Proteins
Members of the ARF (ADP-ribosylation factor) family in membrane trafficking have known homologs linked to human ciliary diseases [120]. In C. reinhardtii, ARFA1a mRNA abundance decreases slightly during flagellar disassembly, but clearly increases during assembly [44]. Scorpion, a zebrafish cystic kidney gene, is a small GTPase in the ARF family [13] necessary for ciliary assembly [121]. In addition, C. elegans ARL6, a member of the ARF-like (ARL) family of GTPases, is linked directly to BBS [122] ARL6 is specifically expressed in ciliated cells and undergoes bidirectional IFT [122]. On the basis of the link between ARL6 and IFT, a role was proposed in trafficking [122] not only in the cytosol, but also in the axoneme. The regulation of ARF expression [44] supports the possibility that ARF plays a similar role in C. reinhardtii IFT. In addition, it was also proposed that other conserved small GTPases, like ARL-13 and ARL-3, coordinate to regulate IFT and that perturbing this balance results in cilia deformation [123].
Two other proteins, a calcium-binding protein, calreticulin (CRT2) [124] and CALK, a Chlamydomonas aurora kinase [125], have also been linked to flagellar assembly and disassembly. A few works have demonstrated that the processes of flagellar excision, gene induction, and outgrowth are each independently regulated by calcium (Ca2+) [126]. CRT2 was shown to have decreased abundance of mRNA during flagellar disassembly, but increased CRT2 during assembly [44], whereas CALK has gained status as a crucial element in the cell's ability to regulate flagellar excision and disassembly by the demonstration [125] that it acts in an early step in both flagellar loss and disassembly and that its down-regulation correlates with down-regulation of its activity later in both assembly and disassembly.

Posttranslational Modified Flagellar Proteins
Flagellar proteins, -and -tubulins, are known to undergo various posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation, palmitoylation, tyrosination/detyrosination, 2 modification, acetylation, glutamylation, and glycylation [127]. Methylation of flagellar proteins, although a new observation with respect to flagellar dynamics [128], is not the only demonstration of posttranslational protein modification in flagella. For example, numerous phosphorylated proteins have been identified in Chlamydomonas flagella, including {alpha}-tubulin [127,129], RSPs [130], ODA [131], and a number of membrane/matrix components [132]. Previous experiments have indicated that protein phosphorylation levels change with alterations in flagellar activity [133]; indeed, the flagellum was long known to contain >80 phosphoproteins [130]. Despite the importance of this posttranslational modification, the identity of many flagellar/ciliary phosphoproteins and the knowledge about their in vivo phosphorylation sites are still missing [18]. Boesger et al. (2009) [18] have used immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) to enrich phosphopeptides from purified flagella that were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS) and they found 141 phosphorylated peptides that belong to 32 flagellar proteins. The authors present a flagellar phosphoproteome that includes different structural and motor proteins, kinases, proteins with protein interaction domains as well as many proteins whose functions are still unknown. Phosphoproteins can possess more than one phosphorylation site, and the phosphorylation status of these sites can fluctuate depending on the physiological conditions under which the cells are kept [134]. This leads to a great variety of phosphoproteins. In addition, the ratio of the phosphorylated to nonphosphorylated form of a protein can be very low. Although proteins can be identified down to the femtomole, and even attomole, level with modern MS, many phosphoproteins within a crude extract (especially those of cell signaling pathways) are not abundant enough to be unambiguously identified by MS. For this reason, enrichment of such proteins is often a prerequisite for efficient phosphoproteome analysis.
Phosphorylation has recently been shown to be important also in the control of flagellar length, as is IFT itself [107,108]. Variations in flagellar length in Chlamydomonas have been correlated with the activity of a novel MAP kinase encoded by the LF4 gene [135], a NIMA-related kinase [136], and glycogen synthase kinase 3 [137], although the target proteins for these kinases have not yet been identified [126].
Axonemal tubulin undergoes several other modifications in addition to phosphorylation, including glycylation, acetylation, and polyglutamylation [127,128]. Recent identification of tubulin-modifying enzymes, especially tubulin tyrosine ligase-like proteins, which perform tubulin glutamylation and glycylation, has demonstrated the importance of tubulin modifications for the assembly and functions of cilia and flagella [127].
Glycylation in ciliary axonemes [138], for example, is such an essential modification that in Tetrahymena it has been linked to a 9+0 and immobile axoneme [139]. Deacetylation and phosphorylation reactions are important in the disassembly of primary cilia, such as in the case of HDAC6, a tubulin deacetylase, that is activated by phosphorylation via CALK [125], what, in turn, promotes ciliary disassembly [140].

THE NANOSTRUCTURED FLAGELLUM MADE OF 650 PROTEINS
The eukaryotic flagellum is a biological nanomachine that is a self-contained mechanochemical oscillator and a force-producing organelle of motility [141] found in organisms as diverse as trypanosomes, green algae, and mammals. Although its 9+2 arrangement has been highly conserved through eukaryotic evolution, there are examples where this standard layout has been modified, including the "9+0" layout of primary cilia and the "9+9+2" of many insect sperm flagella [142]. In addition to this, flagella and cilia show a vast range of key substructures (elegantly visualized in sea urchin by Nicastro et al., 2005 [143] and modeled in Fig. 2), such as the inner (IDA) and outer dynein arms (ODA), and radial spokes [144][145][146][147][148]. Other discrete substructures are nexin links, bipartite bridges, beak-like projections, ponticuli, and other microtubule elaborations that are also essential for cilium/flagellum function. At the base of the eukaryotic flagellum lies a basal body (BB) or kinetosome, which is the microtubule-organizing center for flagellar microtubules. BBs are structurally identical to centrioles. Furthermore, the existence of extra-axonemal structures particular to groups of organisms, such as the paraflagellar rod (PFR) in trypanosomatids [60,105] and the fibrous or rod-like structures in Giardia lamblia [149], contribute to an increase in the organelle complexity that never ceases to amaze us.

Flagellar Dynamics of ATP and Energy Metabolism
As an engine of motility, and like other engines, the axoneme undergoes a cycle of linked events that harness the release of chemical energy to produce useful work. To understand the internal events in the beat cycle, it is essential that we understand the interaction of the forces from the primary dynein motor proteins with the structural components of the axoneme [141,150]. We must recall that the demand from the dynein motors for ATP can be satisfied by the presence of discrete energy generating pathways organized specifically within the flagellar compartment. Importantly, the biochemical identity of such pathways reflects the environment in which the flagellum beats [reviewed by 37].
It has been shown that an ability to provide ATP along the length of the axoneme could be important for sperm motility [151], while now at least four (04) distinct mechanisms for flagellar energy-generating systems can be anticipated. 1) The phosphotransfer relay, in which ATP, generated through oxidative phosphorylation, is trafficked along the length of the axoneme by a creatine kinase-catalysed phosphocreatine shuttle. This mechanism is known to occur in sea urchin [151] and rooster sperms [152]. 2) A regular glycolytic pathway, in which mammalian sperms use glycolytic enzymes, such as hexokinase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, to swim within the microaerobic environment of the female reproductive tract. 3) A semi-or partial glycolytic pathway [153,154], where C. reinhardtii flagella possess three enzymes of the lower half of the glycolytic pathway, which allow ATP production in situ from the glycolytic intermediate 3-phosphoglycerate. One of these enzymes, enolase, is linked to the axoneme through its association with the central pair protein CPC1, whereas the other two glycolytic enzymes, phosphoglycerate mutase and an unusual pyruvate kinase, are located in the membrane + matrix fraction. 4) A putative adenylate kinase-based flagellar energy-generating system [155,156] in which most enzymes of the glycolytic pathway are compartmentalized within the peroxisomal matrix, giving rise to the classification of peroxisomes as glycosomes in trypanosomes [157].

The Axoneme
The canonical axoneme (9+2 arrangement) -the structure most widespread and almost certainly ancestral to all others [158,159] is anchored at the proximal end by a basal body (BB) containing triplet microtubules in a 9+0 arrangement. Dynein arms are attached to the A-tubule of each doublet such that their motor head domains are in close proximity to the B-tubule of the neighboring doublet [4,160]. Activation of the dynein motors causes a sliding force between adjacent doublets [161]. Because the microtubules are constrained at the BB and along their length, this force is translated into an axonemal bend, what has been called the fundamental force of axonemal motion [162].
The movements of flagella are driven by multiple species of dynein heavy chains (DHCs), which constitute IDAs and ODAs. In Chlamydomonas, 11 DHC proteins have been identified in the axoneme, but 14 genes encoding axonemal DHCs are present in the genome. Each previously unassigned DHC gene was assigned to a particular DHC protein and it was found that DHC3, DHC4 and DHC11 encode novel, relatively low abundance DHCs, being localized to the proximal region of the growing flagella [163].
A) The Central Pair Complex (CPC). Numerous studies have indicated that the central apparatus (or the central pair of singlet microtubules with associated projections that is called the central pair complex, CPC) plays a significant role in regulating flagellar motility, yet little is known about how the central pair of microtubules or their associated projections assemble [164]. The presence of the CPC is a characteristic of motile flagella (albeit some types of motile cilia or flagella naturally devoid of a CPC have been reported), while several proteins specifically associated to CPC have been directly implicated in flagellum motility [165], such as the axonemal enolase, which is a subunit of the CPC1 protein, as mentioned before on the semi-or partial glycolytic pathway.
Earlier comparative genomics revealed hydin, the hydrocephalus inducing gene hy3, as highly conserved in flagellates, including C. reinhardtii and human ciliated cells. Mutations in hydin and in other genes encoding ciliary proteins are known to cause hydrocephalus in mice. Flagellar proteomes showed hydin in C. reinhardtii [13] and T. brucei [29]. Furthermore, hydin has recently been located directly to axonemal central apparatus, as a CPC protein [166]. Hydin homologs in several species of Leishmania share high similarity to C. reinhardtii and Danio rerio (zebrafish) hydin [167], as a predicted polypeptide of ~590 kD encoded by a single copy gene spanning ~16,686 bp, as opposed to ~540 kD and ~17,700 bp in Chlamydomonas. For instance, LmjF30.1820, annotated as a conserved hypothetical protein in L. major genome at GeneDB and an ortholog of Tb927.6.3150, has been proposed as a novel hydin by means of its conserved motifs, adenylate kinase and ASH domains, that are both present and believed to bind on two other Chlamydomonas CPC proteins, Cpc1 and Pf6 [167].
B) The Flagellar Tip Complex (FTP). One of the striking observations along the axoneme is that IFT particles move from base to tip at a constant rate without pauses [128]. At the flagellar tip, IFT particles are remodeled [168,169] and, then, begin transport back to the cell body. A biochemical screen, based on difference gel electrophoretic (DIGE) analysis of purified flagella, has identified proteins that localize to the tip of the flagellum [128]. This region (and the proteins comprising it) is now being called the flagellar tip complex (FTC) [128]. These authors have employed DIGE to compare the protein composition of full-length versus regenerating (i.e., short) flagella in an attempt to identify proteins whose abundance in flagella is uniformly increased during regeneration. Proteins in short flagella that increase in abundance relative to full-length flagella would be potential tip proteins. As a matter of fact, they have identified one protein, the cobalamin (vitamin B12) independent form of methionine synthase that catalyzes the conversion of homocysteine to methionine via transfer of a methyl group from 5methyltetrahydrofolate (MetE; EC 2.1.1.14 [EC]) [128]. MetE had been previously identified in Chlamydomonas as a protein whose gene transcription is upregulated in gametes [170], whereas it is also a member of the Chlamydomonas flagellar proteome [13]. MetE is not localized to the flagellar tip, but rather it is distributed along the length of the flagellum, whereas the amount of MetE is higher in regenerating flagella compared with control, full-length flagella [128]. Arguments on what could be the function of MetE in flagella are needed. It does catalyze the conversion of homocysteine to methionine, which is then converted to S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) by methionine adenosyltransferase (EC 2.5.1.6 [EC]), itself a member of the flagellar proteome, what could indicate a potential requirement for protein methylation during flagellar assembly or disassembly dynamics [128]. Protein methylation has long been recognized as an important nuclear event, as histone methylation plays a key role in chromatin structure and transcriptional control. Because cilia and flagella are resorbed before cell division [171,172], the data reported by Schneider et al. (2008) [128] is the first one to link progression through the cell cycle to a requirement for protein methylation in the flagellum.

Extra-Axonemal Structures
Cilia and flagella can also exhibit various extra-axonemal elaborations, and although these are often restricted to specific lineages, there is evidence that some functions, such as metabolic specialization, provided by these diverse structures are conserved [155,173]. Examples of such extra-axonemal elaborations include the fibrous or rod-like structures in the flagellum of the parasite Giardia lamblia [147], kinetoplastid protozoa [105,174], and the fibrous sheath in mammalian sperm flagella [175,176], along with extra sheaths of microtubules in insect sperm flagella [142].
A) The paraflagellar rod (PFR). All kinetoplastids build a flagellum that contains an extra-axonemal structure termed the paraflagellar rod (PFR) [105,162], which usually consists of a complex subdomain organization of proximal, intermediate, and distal domains as well as links to specific doublets of the axoneme and a structure known as the flagellum attachment zone (FAZ) by which the flagellum is attached to the cell body for much of its length [105,177]. This large structure runs along the axoneme from its point of emergence from the flagellar pocket until its distal tip, and it is tightly linked to the axoneme via physical connections to microtubule doublets 4-7 [105]. The PFR is required for kinetoplastid cell motility [178,179] and survival [29,[180][181][182][183][184], serving as a scaffold for metabolic and signaling enzymes [155,185,186].
Two major protein components of the PFR (PFR1 and PFR2) have been identified [187][188][189][190][191] along with several minor PFR protein components [155,185,186,192,193], as well as two PFR-specific adenylate kinases, designated ADKA and ADKB [155], which have an unusual N-terminal extension that is both necessary and sufficient to localize these proteins to the PFR [17].
There is evidence that calmodulin interacts directly with one of the major PFR components [186], whereas several PFR proteins recently described [17] do have PFAM motifs predicted as calmodulin-or calcium-binding domains, in accordance with a predicted role for this interaction. The presence of calmodulin and the calcium and calmodulin recognition domains in the PFR sub-proteome is indicative of a calcium-regulated system operating within the PFR [17].
Despite being described almost fifty years ago, PFR structure has remained enigmatic until a recent report [194] has shed light on a few features of PFR architecture. Recent findings in trypanosomes have demonstrated that individual structural elements of each PFR zone are interconnected to form a single superstructure, while in the intermediate zone, parallel wall-like laths run the length of the flagellum [194]. Therefore, PFR itself is comprised of overlapping laths organized into distinct zones that are connected through twisting elements at the zonal interfaces. The overall structure has an underlying 57nm repeating unit. Biomechanical properties inferred from PFR structure lead to a proposal that the PFR functions as a biomechanical spring that may store and transmit energy derived from axonemal beating [194].
B) The Flagellar Pocket. New evidences agitate the region that comprises a point after the flagellum exits in T. brucei, the flagellar pocket [195,196]. The pocket is an asymmetric membranous 'balloon' with two boundary structures. One of these -the collar -defines the flagellum exit point. The other defines the entry point of the flagellum into the pocket and consists of both an internal transitional fiber array and an external membrane collarette. A novel set of nine radial fibers has been recently described in the basal body (BB) proximal zone [197]. In addition to axoneme and PFR components, a significant amount of membrane is re-quired to construct a flagellum [40], while vesicles are targeted to the base of the flagellar compartment to deliver both membranes and membrane proteins [78]. In trypanosomes, it is known that all trafficking takes place in the flagellar pocket, the only site for endocytosis and exocytosis [for a review see 198]. Results show that in the absence of a new flagellum, a flagellar pocket structure remains associated to the bald BB [99,100]. A flagellar sleeve seems to extend from the BB region of mutant trypanosomes (IFT80RNAiinduced cells), passing through the neck of the pocket [99]. This tip would be maintained on the existing flagellum by the flagellar connector, a structure that holds the distal end of the new flagellum to the side of the old flagellum [99,199]. C) Flagellar Membrane. A conserved membrane protein of kinetoplastids, KMP-11, which has been localized to the flagellum and flagellar pocket [200,201], is currently an exciting concern because of its immunological properties recently uncovered [202]. Another examination of the KMP-11 RNAi phenotype in T. brucei has suggested a role for this protein in regulating BB segregation with additional consequences for nuclear and cell division [203].

GETTING TO THE ROOT OF TRYPANOSOMATID FLAGELLUM BY MEANS OF ACTIN-INTERACTING PROTEINS (AIPS)
The flagellum plays a key role in motility and sensory reception in some eukaryotic pathogens, being essential for parasite migration, invasion and persistence on host tissues [204]. The contribution of locomotion/movement to virulence is well documented for bacterial and viral pathogens. In the case of trypanosomatid protozoan pathogens, e.g., Trypanosoma spp. and Leishmania spp., which mediate their motility through flagellum, the contribution of cell motility to host-pathogen interactions had been largely unexplored until the early 2000's [98]. There were significant evidences of roles for the flagellum in the control of cell size, shape, polarity and division (cytokinesis) in several organisms, including trypanosomatids [11], but not as a direct element in pathogenesis. More recently, some reports have distinguished putative Leishmania flagellar virulence factors and their organization in gene families [101], as well as components of the IFT complex [102] and key flagellar actininteracting proteins [103,204,205]. To survey genes and proteins that can be assigned to a flagellar role in trypanosomatid pathogenesis, a few research groups have applied computational biology and post-genomic tools in order to improve/refine the identification of flagellar elements in genomes, transcriptomes and proteomes [17,29,40,79,100,101,185,196,[206][207][208][209][210][211].
With the advances of genome related research and the computational biology advent, post-genomics and bioinformatics analyses have fundamentally changed the nature of research strategies; there has been an explosion of new information on all types of proteins, including the actinassociated proteins, their regulation, their roles in signaling and also in flagellar assembly and disassembly. Some of these proteins have close homologs in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, becoming clear that the mechanisms behind their functional roles might be essentially similar across divergent species. Bioinformatics analysis also in-tends to provide initial elements for guiding future in vitro studies, while these recent data provide a more detailed annotation of gene products. This is another point that will help to improve the current knowledge about flagellate organisms and their proteins of interest, such as flagellar actin and actin-related or -interacting proteins (ARPs or AIPs). We must recall that the driving force underlying internalization into the host cell is thought to involve both polymerization of parasite actin and actin motor-associated proteins. Investigations have undertaken comparative genomics and postgenomics in flagellate organisms to address their flagellar dynamics [79,211,212]. Since AIPs are actively involved in remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton (and the respective signaling mechanisms) via activation of other AIPs and microtubule-related activities, both processes directly involve cell motility and the eukaryotic flagellum (and a network of associated proteins). Therefore, clarifying the elements that play a role in such flagellar remodeling network might improve our understanding of how trypanosomatids establish a successful infection.
Our own recent post-genomics work [101-103, 205, 206, 209] has focused upon flagellar metabolism in the pathogenic protozoan Leishmania. Results concerning these detailed sequence and structural analyses, performed on different data, turned out to unveil genes (and gene products) such as profilin, formin, katanin, coronin, cofilin, twinfilin, among others. These proteins have a common feature of actin-binding/interacting activity and might be involved in Leishmania intraflagellar pathways. In vitro and in silico examinations have helped in the secondary annotation of pathogen genomes, such as Leishmania spp., an indirect contribution to a better understanding of the diseases they cause.
Proteins such as profilins are thought to regulate actin polymerization in response to extracellular signals, acting at a critical control point in signalling pathways initiated by events at the plasma membrane, and playing a crucial role in regulating the activity in the microfilament system and intracellular calcium levels [reviewed in 213]. The importance of profilins for normal cell proliferation and differentiation has been documented in genetic studies, showing that profilin gene disruption leads to grossly impaired growth, motility, and cytokinesis in single cells and embryonic lethality in multicellular organisms such as insects and mice [213]. Studies on profilins (regulators of cytoplasmic actin dynamics, binding to several nuclear proteins) have been performed on the sense that, although not yet experimentally characterized in flagellated protozoa, profilins might have a distinctive role on parasite flagellar dynamics and remodeling since they are also actually part of the flagellar proteome map reference. Their importance in the trypanosomatid IFT process can be greater than hinted at first; markedly if, in a near future, experimental in vitro work with profilins succeeds to prove that they actually function as hubs of a complex network of molecular interactions in the flagellum. Moreover, the subcellular localization of functional profilins [214] and their constant presence on flagellar proteomes [13,30] provide additional evidences for specific roles in flagellar activities.
ADF/cofilins are ubiquitous actin dynamics-regulating proteins that have been mainly implicated in actin-based cell motility [215]. They are formed by a single folded domain, the ADF homology (ADF-H) domain, which is also found in other AIP families, including Abp1p, drebrins (a single ADF-H domain linked to another motif), twinfilin (a duplication of this domain is the reason for the name) and coactosin. The ADF/cofilins themselves vary in size from 113 to 168 amino acids, while the main actin-binding structure of the ADF/cofilins is the long alpha-helix starting, for example in human destrin, at Leu111 and terminating at Phe128. Most ADF/cofilins contain at least one nuclear-localization signal (NLS) close to the amino terminus. Trypanosomatids also contain a putative ADF/cofilin homologue [211,215], as there are three sequences on Leishmania genomes that correspond to a cofilin-like gene in each species, L. major, L. infantum and L. braziliensis (LmjF29.0510, LinJ29_V3.0520 and LbrM29_V2.0450), one of them modeled to a 3D structure as can be seen on Fig. (4). An interesting and instructive sequence (and, by inference, structural) variance among compared cofilin sequences is revealed by few details in multiple alignments shown by Pacheco et al. (2009) [205] and also represented here in the Fig. (4). Nevertheless, the ADF/cofilin role in trypanosomatid flagellar motility remained largely unexplored until the ADF/cofilin gene was knocked out in Leishmania by targeted gene replacement and resultant mutants were completely immotile, short and stumpy, with reduced flagellar length and severely impaired beat [211]. In addition, the assembly of the paraflagellar rod was lost, vesicle-like structures were seen throughout the length of the flagellum and the state and distribution of actin were altered. The authors observed that episomal complementation of the gene restored normal morphology and flagellar function, what helped them to conclude that the actin dynamics-regulating protein ADF/cofilin plays a critical role in assembly and motility of the Leishmania flagellum [211,215].

CURRENT PERSPECTIVES FOR NOVEL FLAG-ELLAR ROLES
Several recent studies have set out to determine the protein composition of the flagellum and demonstrated the existence of both an evolutionarily conserved core of flagellum proteins and a large number of lineage-restricted components [10,13,17,26,29,210,216]. Although these approaches provide an invaluable catalogue of the protein components of the flagellum (Table 1), it has been argued that they provide only limited information on the substructural localization of proteins and do not address either the likely protein-protein interactions or the function of these proteins within the flagellum [17].

Recent Proteomic Complimentary Techniques
In this regard, the protein composition of some axonemal substructures, such as RSP complexes [148,217], has been determined by direct isolation of these structures, and a number of complexes have been resolved by the use of coimmunoprecipitation of indicator proteins [218]. In addition, the localization and function of a number of flagellar proteins have been investigated by detailed analysis of mutant cell lines of C. reinhardtii exhibiting defined structural defects within the assembled axoneme. The early studies of Luck and Piperno employed 2D PAGE to compare protein profiles of purified flagella derived from C. reinhardtii mu-tants and wild type cells [129,130,219,220], but these elegant works did not allow identification of the individual proteins within the profiles [17].
On the other hand, recent proteomic advances offer the opportunity to improve this identification, good examples being the comparative proteomic technique isotope coded affinity tagging [221], which has been used to identify components of the ODA [222], and the immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography (IMAC), which is based on the presence of negatively charged phosphate groups and enriches for phosphorylated Ser, Thr, and Tyr [31,134]. The first technique utilizes stable isotope tagging to quantify the relative concentration of proteins between two samples [17]. Additional comparative approaches include the utilization of 2D difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE, [223]) and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ; Applied Biosystems) to reveal protein components of flagellar structures via ablation by inducible RNA interference mutation [17]. These two complementary proteomic approaches, DIGE and iTRAQ, were used together with RNAi, establishing a mutant/proteomic combination as a powerful enabling approach for revealing dependences within subcohorts of the flagellar proteome, with 20 novel proteins identified as components of the PFR [17]. The authors have argued that the detected dependences might be due to interactions in the final PFR structure or a result of the process of transporting proteins to the flagellum.
Other resources such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods, which are very useful in bioorganic and medicinal chemistry to discover small-sized drugs, may help to identify new targets, if applied to flagellar proteins, as recently studied with Leishmania dyneins [210]. Another current approach is to apply proteomics to the investigation of posttranslational modifications as phosphorylation, one of the key modifications of proteins, which is crucial in the control of many regulatory pathways, affecting protein function, activity, stability, localization, and interactions [134]. Therefore, information about the phosphoproteome (the proteome analysis of phosphoproteins) is extremely useful for understanding a variety of cellular processes, with several previously identified flagellar phosphoproteins of C. reinhardtii, such as the {alpha} heavy chain of ODA, RSPs [131,134] and IC138, a WD repeat dynein intermediate chain [224], being validated through the latest flagellar phosphoproteome reported by [18].

Post-Genomic Complimentary Techniques
The maskless photolithographic DNA synthesis technology [32,117,225] is a means to construct high-density DNA oligonucleotide microarrays to represent exons from each strand of a given genome, as it has been done for the Chlamydomonas genome [32]. These authors measured the transcriptional activity for all of the Chlamydomonas exons, while arrays were probed with fluorescence-labeled cDNA, reverse-transcribed from total RNA isolated from cells that were grown for 30, 45, and 120 minutes after deflagellation [65], in very elegant experiments [32].
Microarray and genomics and proteomics techniques, plus libraries of expressed sequence tags (ESTs), in combination with digital differential display tools and publicly Fig. (3). Three-dimensional structures of the first intraflagellar transport (IFT) proteins deposited at Protein Data Bank (PDB). The Chlamydomonas reinhardtii IFT complex 25/27 can be seen on panels A (PDB ID 2CY2) and B (2CY4) [110]. Images are viewed after PDB access modifications made in RCSB PDB Protein Worshop 3.9 ® .   Fig. (4). Three-dimensional structure of cofilin. A) A 3D model of Leishmania infantum cofilin after B) the PDB template 1QVP_A. A significantly well conserved display of secondary and tertiary structural features can be seen and easily correlated to the average 37% overall similarity between the two primary sequences. Both cofilins have a central mixed -sheet, which is sandwiched between two pairs ofhelices. The highly conserved residues said to be important for protein stability and correct folding (Tyr64, Trp88, Pro90, and Tyr101, with the exception of Phe85) are present in all Leishmania cofilin sequences and shown in L. infantum modeled cofilin. available gene expression and genome databases, are being currently used to identify and characterize novel flagellar and flagella-related proteins [28,203], as illustrated by the large number of recently characterized proteins. The ability of bioinformatics and these aforementioned techniques to identify cilia and flagella-related genes has been documented several times [10,13,14,26,28,32]. The power of such proteome approaches lies in the identification of novel components (Tables 1 and 2) and modifications that have not been discovered before [31].

FINAL REMARKS
In quoting Gibbons & Grimstone (1960) [3] inspiring words about the eukaryotic flagellum: "one cannot fail to be impressed by its extraordinary complexity…and…relative simplicity", we could not pick a better statement to close this review. Our own impression on this intriguing and neverending surprising organelle is that it is on the beginning of its emergence to large audiences. Investigations on the functions of flagella-specific proteins (Tables 1 and 2) will continue to enlighten the unique biological activities of the flagellum and future endeavors should further refine our knowledge of flagella and cilia at its designated cellular address. One of the most relevant discoveries in flagellum re-search, the IFT [82], has set the cornerstone for a new appreciation of cilia as antennae that sense fluid flow, fluid pressure, or ligands that facilitate intercellular signaling and can link specific molecular defects in this organelle to a host of human ciliopathies [226]. These ciliopathies are marked by an amazing diversity of clinical manifestations and an often complex genetic aetiology [227]. The green algae Chlamydomonas and its pair of flagella have taught us all a lot [82,227]; and surely they will keep being essential for improving our comparative understanding of so many important events that comprise this unique organelle. Moreover, multicellular organisms such as mouse, zebrafish, Xenopus, Caenorhabditis elegans or Drosophila, and protists such as Paramecium, Tetrahymena, Trypanosoma and Leishmania each bring specific advantages to the study of flagellum/cilium biology [227]. For all that has already been discovered (and for all that yet remains to be clarified) about the eukaryotic flagellum, it is clear that it will make many more days as the current one giving name to this review.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author(s) confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest. The Chlamydomonas Flagellar Proteome Project (http://labs.umassmed.edu/chlamyfp/index.php), as well as genome data of flagellate pathogens from the GeneDB project, a core part of the Sanger Institute Pathogen Genomics (www.genedb.org). Financial support for this study was obtained from Brazilian funding agencies, CNPq and FUN-CAP, through individual research grants to DMO (CNPq 310705/2010-0) and graduate fellowships to MCD and ACLP; as well as from Universidade Estadual do Ceara (UECE) internal funds. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Supplementary material is available on the publishers web site along with the published article.