Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


The relationship between humans and viruses has a long history. Since the first identification of viruses in the 19th century, we have considered them to be 'pathogens' and have studied their mechanisms of replication and pathogenicity to combat the diseases that they cause. However, the relationships between hosts and viruses are various and virus infections do not necessarily cause diseases in their hosts. Rather, recent studies have shown that viral infections sometimes have beneficial effects on the biological functions and/or evolution of hosts. Here, we provide some insight into the positive side of viruses.

Free full text 


Logo of ctiLink to Publisher's site
Clin Transl Immunology. 2020; 9(2): e01114.
Published online 2020 Feb 19. https://doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1114
PMCID: PMC7029637
PMID: 32099651

Villains or heroes? The raison d'être of viruses

Abstract

The relationship between humans and viruses has a long history. Since the first identification of viruses in the 19th century, we have considered them to be ‘pathogens’ and have studied their mechanisms of replication and pathogenicity to combat the diseases that they cause. However, the relationships between hosts and viruses are various and virus infections do not necessarily cause diseases in their hosts. Rather, recent studies have shown that viral infections sometimes have beneficial effects on the biological functions and/or evolution of hosts. Here, we provide some insight into the positive side of viruses.

Keywords: neo‐virology, viral purpose, viral roles in the ecosystem

Abstract

Traditionally, viruses have been considered to be ‘pathogens’ that cause diseases in their hosts. In this review, we discuss recent studies that shed light on previously unrecognised beneficial roles of viruses in nature.

Introduction

Viruses, which consist of nucleic acid encased in a protein shell, are parasites of host organisms. The term ‘virus’ comes from the Latin word ‘venom’, which means poison, because a virus is generally considered to be a causative agent like a poison that causes infectious diseases. These tiny, living entities have considerable import, because they can cause substantial damage to humans and non‐human animals and other living organisms. The relationship between humankind and viruses has a long history. For example, the earliest evidence of smallpox was found in 3000‐year‐old Egyptian mummies, who had smallpox‐like eruptions on their skins.1 The overall mortality rate of smallpox was around 30%,2 making it one of the most feared infectious diseases. In 1918–1919, during World War I, influenza A virus caused the Spanish flu pandemic, resulting in infection of approximately 500 million people and more than 20–40 million death worldwide.3

Since the initial isolation of viruses in the 19th century, scientists have identified and characterised a wide variety of viruses, and the field of virology has progressed remarkably since then, enabling us to combat the frequently deadly effects of these viruses. One of the greatest achievements is the complete eradication of smallpox. Although smallpox was once rampant in the world, vaccination of the entire population has eradicated this disease.1 Similarly, the poliovirus vaccine has significantly reduced the incidence of poliomyelitis.4 Despite the progress of virology, we still have many unconquered viral diseases and we are confronted with the problem of emerging infectious diseases, which are caused by newly identified species or strains. For example, Ebola virus disease and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome emerged in 1976 and 1981, respectively,5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and more recently, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) have appeared in human society.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Therefore, it is important to continue studying the mechanisms of viral replication and pathogenicity.

Yet, these negative aspects of viruses do not tell the whole story since the relationships between hosts and viruses are multitudinous, and virus infections do not necessarily lead to disease symptoms in hosts. Rather, recent studies suggest that there are viruses that are beneficial to the biological functions and/or evolution of their hosts. Recently, we established a research consortium, designated as ‘Neo‐virology’, which is supported by Grants‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. In this consortium, we define a virus as a component of the global ecosystem. Our aim was to elucidate the roles of viruses in host organisms and the global ecosystem, in contrast to traditional virology research, which tends to focus on pathogenic viruses that cause diseases in their hosts. This research project is expected to develop into an important scientific field that examines the interactions between the global ecosystem and viruses. In this brief review, we give some insights into the positive side of viruses.

Beneficial effects of viral infection on mammalian hosts

In traditional virology, most viruses found in humans are considered to be pathogenic to their hosts; however, recent studies have shown that there are some viruses that have symbiotic relationships with their hosts and do not cause disease. Infection with one virus may protect the host from a superinfection with another pathogen. Barton et al.16 demonstrated that latent infection with the herpesviruses murine gammaherpesvirus 68 or murine cytomegalovirus, which are genetically related to the human pathogens Epstein‐Barr virus and human cytomegalovirus, respectively, led to cross‐protection in mice. Infection with these viruses induced prolonged production of the antiviral cytokine interferon‐gamma and systemic activation of macrophages that protected the mice from subsequent bacterial infections with either Listeria monocytogenes or Yersinia pestis.16 Moreover, it has been reported that superinfection with hepatitis A virus suppressed hepatitis C virus replication in patients with chronic hepatitis C in at least two cases,17 and infection with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) suppressed superinfection with HIV‐1 in vitro as a result of the downregulation of the expression of CCR5, a co‐receptor for HIV‐1, induced by the HCMV infection.18

Some viruses also have beneficial effects with respect to non‐infectious diseases. Epidemiologic studies suggest that virus infections in childhood might confer protection against some cancers later in life. For example, the risk of chronic lymphoid leukaemia in subjects who had measles in childhood is relatively low,19 and mumps infection in childhood might protect against the development of ovarian cancer in adults.20 However, infection with oncoviruses is known to increase the risk of development of some cancers (e.g. cervical cancer and liver cancer induced by the human papillomavirus and hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus infection, respectively).21 Such information is important when considering strategies for cancer immunotherapy and/or vaccination campaigns. In addition, the infection of non‐obese diabetic mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus prevented the infected mice from developing autoimmune disease and subsequent type I diabetes (insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus).22, 23 Chronic viral infection of mice with murine cytomegalovirus (CMV) increased epithelial turnover and wound repair via antiviral cytokine type I interferons (IFNs),24 but CMV infection can promote cancer malignancy; this phenomenon is known as ‘oncomodulation’.25, 26

Recent metagenomic studies have revealed that virus infection sometimes confers benefits including the regulation of microbiota in the gut. Bacteriophages are abundant in the gut and are thought to modulate the gut microbiota by infecting specific bacterial populations. Accordingly, potential therapeutic applications of bacteriophages in humans (e.g. control of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria, stabilisation of healthy gut microbes) have been considered.27, 28

Therefore, the elucidation of the symbiotic effects of viruses on the physiological functions and immune responses of their hosts, as well as clarification of the functional mechanisms involved, will lead to an understanding of the essential roles of viruses in regulating the biological processes of their hosts.

Endogenous viral elements in mammalian genomes

Retroviruses are found in almost all mammals and other vertebrates, and approximately 8% of the human genome is composed of retroviruses in the form of endogenised proviruses.29, 30 Given that only about 1% of genomic DNA is made up of protein‐coding genes, the abundance of retrovirus sequences in the human genome is remarkable. Retrovirus sequences are conserved in humans and other primates, and therefore, the endogenisation of retroviruses is thought to have occurred millions of years ago.31 Some endogenous retroviruses have been shown to play beneficial roles in their hosts, including host evolution. For example, envelope genes from endogenous retroviruses contribute to the formation of the placenta during the fusion of syncytiotrophoblast cells in mammals.32, 33 In addition, endogenous retroviral elements are known to protect host cells from infection with exogenous retroviruses in some mammals.33, 34, 35

In addition to retroviruses, recent studies have shown that non‐retroviral viruses have also endogenised in many mammalian species.36, 37, 38 For example, Tomonaga's group, which is one of the research groups in our Neo‐virology research consortium, discovered that bornaviruses, a genus of non‐segmented, negative‐strand RNA virus, have been endogenised in the genomes of many mammals, including humans.36 Since bornaviruses do not encode reverse transcriptase and integrase genes, integration of bornavirus segments is believed to be mediated by long interspersed nuclear element‐1 (LINE‐1), which is a retrotransposon widely distributed in mammalian genomes.39 Tomonaga's group also showed that an endogenous bornavirus‐like element in the ground squirrel genome blocks infection and replication of extant endogenous bornavirus.40 Together, these findings indicate a potential role for endogenous non‐retroviral elements in antiviral defence. This group also performed an evolutionary phylogenetic analysis to elucidate the functions of endogenous bornavirus in mammalian genomes.41

Thus, it has become apparent that a large number of endogenous viral elements have accumulated in host genomes, more than previously expected. Therefore, it is important that we understand the significance of endogenous viral elements to the biological function and evolution of hosts.

Diversity of viruses: discovery of novel viruses in nature

The first virus to be identified in humans was the yellow fever virus in 1901 after the discovery of tobacco mosaic virus in 1892 in plants and foot‐and‐mouth disease virus in 1898 in animals.42 Since then, new virus species that infect humans have been identified almost every year. Woolhouse et al.43 reviewed human viruses that had been described in the literature and recognised by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), and drew a discovery curve for human viruses by plotting the cumulative number of species reported to infect humans; they showed that new species of human viruses have been discovered at a rate of three or four per year. Currently, there are approximately 263 viruses from 25 viral families that are known to be able to infect humans according to the latest ICTV report.44

In the last a few decades, emerging infectious diseases caused by newly identified viruses, such as Ebola virus,5, 6, 7, 8 SARS and MERS coronaviruses,10, 11, 12 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV),9 Nipah virus and Hendra virus,45, 46, 47, 48 have appeared in human society. Most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic, caused by viruses that originate in wild animals, such as primates, rodents and bats49, 50, 51; in particular, bats have drawn attention because a recent comprehensive analysis of mammalian host–virus relationships indicated that bats have a significantly higher proportion of zoonotic viruses than all other mammalian orders.52 This analysis was part of a study supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT programme (https://ohi.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/programs-projects/predict-project), which was initiated in 2009, working with partners in over 30 countries on global surveillance of viruses to identify and monitor zoonotic pathogens. To date, the PREDICT programme has found over 1100 viruses in animals and humans, including a new Ebola virus and MERS‐ and SARS‐like coronaviruses. In 2018, the Global Virome Project (http://www.globalviromeproject.org) was launched, which aims to conduct viral surveillance on an even larger scale than the PREDICT programme. Those involved in this project estimate that ~1.67 million yet‐to‐be‐discovered viral species from key zoonotic viral families exist in mammal and avian hosts, and expect that 631 000–827 000 of these unknown viruses have zoonotic potential.44 In addition to viral surveillance in mammals and avian hosts, Zhang and Holmes's group recently conducted a screen for RNA viruses in diverse host species (more than 186 species other than mammalian and avian hosts) and identified about 200 vertebrate‐associated RNA viruses in fishes, reptiles and amphibians.53 They also found that vertebrate‐specific viral families or genera known to infect mammals and birds, including influenza viruses, filoviruses and hantaviruses, are also present in amphibians, reptiles and fish.53

In addition to the identification of new virus species in diverse hosts, new virus lifestyles have also been found in nature. Suzuki's group, which is one of the groups in our Neo‐virology research consortium, recently reported a new virus lifestyle exhibited by two RNA viruses: a double‐stranded (ds) RNA virus (yado‐nushi virus 1, YnV1) and a positive‐sense, single‐stranded [(+)ss] RNA virus (yado‐kari virus 1, YkV1) in a phytopathogenic fungus, Rosellinia necatrix.54 They found that the (+)ssRNA virus (YkV1), which does not have its own capsid protein, hijacks the capsid protein of the dsRNA virus (YnV1) to replicate.55

Conclusion

Our world is made up of vastly different physical environments and the various organisms that have adapted to live in those environments. The complex interactions between the living and non‐living components of these environments are the basis of the global ecosystem. Various schemes have been proposed to classify living organisms: the one most often used currently defines all living organisms as archaea, bacteria or eukaryotes. Therefore, viruses are not considered living components of the global ecosystem. Given that approximately 1031 virus particles exist on Earth56, 57 and all of them are parasitic in living organisms, it is not hard to imagine how virus infection might affect the physiological functions of both hosts and the ecosystem. Although ‘traditional’ virology research tends to focus on pathogenic viruses that cause diseases in their hosts, the recent progress in next‐generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and data analyses has enabled us to discover a wide variety of new viruses, some of which do not cause diseases in their hosts. Some obstacles to comprehensive virome analyses remain, such as viral dark matter, which are sequences that originate during virus metagenomics but cannot be aligned to any reference sequences of viruses.58 Nonetheless, recent viral metagenomic studies using NGS technologies and bioinformatic analyses have identified a large number of viruses in environmental samples, including plants and oceans.59, 60 Characterisation of these newly identified viruses may provide new insight into the significance of viruses and virus‐mediated processes within global ecosystems.

Conflict of interest

YK has received speaker's honoraria from Toyama Chemical and Astellas and grant support from Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceutical, Toyama Chemical, Tauns Laboratories, Otsuka Pharmaceutical and Kyoritsu Seiyaku; and is a founder of FluGen.

Acknowledgments

We thank Susan Watson for editing the manuscript. This research was supported by Grants‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (Nos. 16H06429, 16K21723 and 16H06434), by Research Program on Emerging and Re‐emerging Infectious Diseases from AMED (JP19fm0208101j0001), by the Fund for the Promotion of Joint International Research (Fostering Joint International Research (B)) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JP18KK0225), and by the NIAID‐funded Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis (CRIP, HHSN272201400008C).

Contributor Information

Tokiko Watanabe, pj.ca.oykot-u.smi@wokikot.

Yoshihiro Kawaoka, ude.csiw@akoawak.orihihsoy.

References

1. Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Jezek Z, Ladnyi ID. The history of smallpox and its spread around the world In: Fenner F. (ed). Smallpox and its Eradication. Geneva: WHO, 1988; 1460. [Google Scholar]
2. Li Y, Carroll DS, Gardner SN, Walsh MC, Vitalis EA, Damon IK. On the origin of smallpox: Correlating variola phylogenics with historical smallpox records. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 15787–15792. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Taubenberger JK, Reid AH, Janczewski TA, Fanning TG. Integrating historical, clinical and molecular genetic data in order to explain the origin and virulence of the 1918 Spanish influenza virus. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2001; 356: 1829–1839. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Nathanson N, Kew OM. From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172: 1213–1229. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Johnson KM, Lange JV, Webb PA, Murphy FA. Isolation and partial characterisation of a new virus causing acute haemorrhagic fever in Zaire. Lancet 1977; 309: 569–571. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Bowen ETW, Lloyd G, Harris WJ, Platt GS, Baskerville A, Vella EE. Viral haemorrhagic fever in southern Sudan and northern Zaire: preliminary studies on the aetiological agent. Lancet 1977; 309: 571–573. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Pattyn S, van der Groen G, Jacob W, Piot P, Courteille G. Isolation of Marburg‐like virus from a case of haemorrhagic fever in Zaire. Lancet 1977; 309: 573–574. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. Commission R of an I . Ebola haemorrhagic fever in Zaire, 1976. Bull World Health Organ 1978; 56: 271–293. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Ho DD, Bieniasz PD. HIV‐1 at 25. Cell 2008; 133: 561–565. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus ADME, Fouchier RAM. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1814–1820. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Peiris JSM, Lai ST, Poon LLM et al Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 2003; 361: 1319–1325. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Drosten C, Günther S, Preiser W et al Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1967–1976. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. de Jong JC, Claas ECJ, Osterhaus ADME, Webster RG, Lim WL. A pandemic warning? Nature 1997; 389: 554. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Yuen KY, Chan PKS, Peiris M et al Clinical features and rapid viral diagnosis of human disease associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus. Lancet 1998; 351: 467–471. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Subbarao K, Klimov A, Katz J et al Characterization of an avian influenza A (H5N1) virus isolated from a child with a fatal respiratory illness. Science 1998; 279: 393–396. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Barton ES, White DW, Cathelyn JS et al Herpesvirus latency confers symbiotic protection from bacterial infection. Nature 2007; 447: 326. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Deterding K, Tegtmeyer B, Cornberg M et al Hepatitis A virus infection suppresses hepatitis C virus replication and may lead to clearance of HCV. J Hepatol 2006; 45: 770–778. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. King CA, Baillie J, Sinclair JH. Human cytomegalovirus modulation of CCR5 expression on myeloid cells affects susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Gen Virol 2006; 87: 2171–2180. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Parodi S, Crosignani P, Miligi L et al Childhood infectious diseases and risk of leukaemia in an adult population. Int J Cancer 2013; 133: 1892–1899. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
20. Cramer DW, Vitonis AF, Pinheiro SP et al Mumps and ovarian cancer: modern interpretation of an historic association. Cancer Causes Control 2010; 21: 1193–1201. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
21. Vedham V, Verma M, Mahabir S. Early‐life exposures to infectious agents and later cancer development. Cancer Med 2015; 4: 1908–1922. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
22. Oldstone MB. Prevention of type I diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice by virus infection. Science 1988; 239: 500–502. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
23. Oldstone MBAI. Treatment of nonobese insulin‐dependent diabetes mice with virus prevents insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus while maintaining general immune competence from their initial discovery (1–3), and to the present (4–6), viruses have been known as agent. J Exp Med 1990; 171: 2077–2089. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Sun L, Miyoshi H, Origanti S et al Type I interferons link viral infection to enhanced epithelial turnover and repair. Cell Host Microbe 2015; 17: 85–97. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
25. Michaelis M, Doerr HW, Cinatl J. The story of human cytomegalovirus and cancer: increasing evidence and open questions. Neoplasia 2009; 11: 1–9. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
26. Herbein G. The human cytomegalovirus, from oncomodulation to oncogenesis. Viruses 2018; 10: 1–16. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
27. Kortright KE, Chan BK, Koff JL, Turner PE. Phage therapy: a renewed approach to combat antibiotic‐resistant bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 2019; 25: 219–232. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
28. Scarpellini E, Ianiro G, Attili F, Bassanelli C, De Santis A, Gasbarrini A. The human gut microbiota and virome: potential therapeutic implications. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47: 1007–1012. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
29. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B et al Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409: 860–921. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
30. Jern P, Coffin JM. Effects of retroviruses on host genome function. Annu Rev Genet 2008; 42: 709–732. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
31. Holmes EC. Virus evolution In: Knipe DM, Howley PM. (eds). Fields Virology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013: 286–313. [Google Scholar]
32. Mi S, Lee X, Li X et al Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature 2000; 403: 785–789. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
33. Aswad A, Katzourakis A. Paleovirology and virally derived immunity. Trends Ecol Evol 2012; 27: 627–636. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
34. Stoye JP. Studies of endogenous retroviruses reveal a continuing evolutionary saga. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012; 10: 395–406. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
35. Mura M, Murcia P, Caporale M et al Late viral interference induced by transdominant Gag of an endogenous retrovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 11117–11122. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
36. Horie M, Honda T, Suzuki Y et al Endogenous non‐retroviral RNA virus elements in mammalian genomes. Nature 2010; 463: 84–87. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
37. Belyi VA, Levine AJ, Skalka AM. Unexpected inheritance: multiple integrations of ancient bornavirus and ebolavirus/marburgvirus sequences in vertebrate genomes. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6: e1001030. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
38. Katzourakis A, Gifford RJ. Endogenous viral elements in animal genomes. PLoS Genet 2010; 6: e1001191. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
39. Horie M, Kobayashi Y, Suzuki Y, Tomonaga K. Comprehensive analysis of endogenous bornavirus‐like elements in eukaryote genomes. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2013; 368: 20120499. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
40. Fujino K, Horie M, Honda T, Merriman DK, Tomonaga K. Inhibition of Borna disease virus replication by an endogenous bornavirus‐like element in the ground squirrel genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 13175–13180. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
41. Horie M, Tomonaga K. Paleovirology of bornaviruses: What can be learned from molecular fossils of bornaviruses. Virus Res 2019; 262: 2–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
42. Enquist L, Racaniello V. Virology: from contagium fluidum to virome In: Knipe DM, Howley PM. (eds). Fields Virology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013: 1–20. [Google Scholar]
43. Woolhouse M, Scott F, Hudson Z, Howey R, Chase‐Topping M. Human viruses: discovery and emeraence. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2012; 367: 2864–2871. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
44. Carroll D, Daszak P, Wolfe ND, et al The global virome project. Science 2018; 359: 872–874. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
45. Murray K, Selleck P, Hooper P, et al A morbillivirus that caused fatal disease in horses and humans. Science 1995; 268: 94–97. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
46. Field H, Young P, Yob JM et al The natural history of Hendra and Nipah viruses. Microbes Infect 2001; 3: 307–317. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
47. Paton NI, Leo YS, Zaki SR et al Outbreak of Nipah‐virus infection among abattoir workers in Singapore. Lancet 1999; 354: 1253–1256. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
48. Chua KB, Goh KJ, Wong KT et al Fatal encephalitis due to Nipah virus among pig‐farmers in Malaysia. Lancet 1999; 354: 1257–1259. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
49. Woolhouse MEJ, Gowtage‐Sequeria S. Host range and emerging and reemerging pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis J 2005; 11: 1842. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
50. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA et al Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008; 451: 990–993. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
51. Taylor LH, Latham SM, Woolhouse MEJ. Risk factors for human disease emergence. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2001; 356: 983–989. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
52. Olival KJ, Hosseini PR, Zambrana‐Torrelio C, Ross N, Bogich TL, Daszak P. Host and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals. Nature 2017; 546: 646–650. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
53. Shi M, Lin XD, Chen X et al The evolutionary history of vertebrate RNA viruses. Nature 2018; 556: 197–202. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
54. Kondo H, Kanematsu S, Suzuki N. Chapter seven ‐ viruses of the white root rot fungus, Rosellinia necatrix In: Ghabrial SA. (ed). Mycoviruses. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2013: 177–214. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
55. Zhang R, Hisano S, Tani A, Kondo H, Kanematsu S, Suzuki N. A capsidless ssRNA virus hosted by an unrelated dsRNA virus. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1: 15001. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
56. Hamilton G. The gene weavers. Nature 2006; 441: 683–685. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
57. Suttle CA. Marine viruses — major players in the global ecosystem. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5: 801–812. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
58. Krishnamurthy SR, Wang D. Origins and challenges of viral dark matter. Virus Res 2017; 239: 136–142. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
59. Roossinck MJ. Metagenomics of plant and fungal viruses reveals an abundance of persistent lifestyles. Front Microbiol 2015; 5: 767. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
60. Gregory A, Zayed A, Conceição‐Neto N et al Viral macro‐and micro‐diversity from pole to pole. Cell 2019; 177: 1109–1123.e14. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical & Translational Immunology are provided here courtesy of Australasian Society of Immunology

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/76682618
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/76682618

Article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.


Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (1)

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (1)

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (3)

NIAID NIH HHS (1)

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1)