TXNIP and infection: TXNIP is significantly more highly transcribed in KO2 than WT infection [log2(fold change) = 0.79, p=2.1 × 10−13; Figure 11C, left column] and, although it is below our thresholds for qualification as a DEG in these analyses, it is transcriptionally regulated in opposing directions in the WT vs. mock [log2(fold change) = −0.43, p=0.055] and KO2 vs. mock [log2(fold change) = 0.64, p=7.0 × 10−5] comparisons (Figure 11A and B, left column), suggesting the difference is not related to replication kinetics.