ERG and neoplasm: In comparison with the best model with GS and fusion ERG (AUC, 0.79) in [5], our model 1.3 with the GS and TSP-selected gene pairs performed better, with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI = [0.81,0.88]); our best model was model 1.9, which used GS, tumor percentage, and one TSP-selected gene pair (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI = [0.79, 0.92]), but the corresponding model reported by Sboner with fusion ERG for replacement yielded an AUC of 0.75 [5].